AS I understand it, the idea of X1 is to search an accumulation of data, not to run a series or completely independent index and search operations with multiple indexes. Then it would be a matter of a single click to switch between examining PST A and PST B.īut as I said, if someone has told you that you must not allow these PST files to get too close to one another, you are probably stuffed.
Just use that as the search term.Įven better, you could create a series of Saved searches, one for each PST file based on that Path column.
Even if the PST files have same names, the location (path) will be different. Matching document may also have multiple parents, siblings. If you search All Email in Outlook, you can use the Path column to home in on a particular PST. If Archive Search for Outlook unexpectedly disappears, the tool may have been. In this article, we will examine searching email messages, and PST files in particular PST. Unless I have completely misunderstood the challenge, which is quite likely, you don't need separate indexes, simply a way of telling the PSTs apart within an index. If you keep taking them away it quite rightly does what you have told it to do, and forgets them.īut unless someone has told you not to index them all at once, I see why you cannot index the whole caboodle and then use the search feature to tell the PSTs apart. The idea is that once it gets its clutches on your PST files, it remembers them. It sounds like you are asking X1 to do something that it isn't designed for.